Is Ultrasound in Pregnancy Safe?

What should parents know about the safety of ultrasound today.

18 Comments
Join the Conversation
3-D ultrasound - Jyn Meyer
3-D ultrasound - Jyn Meyer
Ultrasound has multiple purposes during pregnancy including confirming the pregnancy, checking for defects and the growth of the baby. Questions about safety exist.

Ultrasound has been used in obstetrics since the late 1950’s and early 1960’s. However we are now in an age where ultrasound is offered to every woman, often multiple times during pregnancy. In fact, 3-D ultrasound photos are desired by a growing number of parents and celebrities even purchase ultrasound equipment to use at home. We can only wonder at the safety of this prenatal testing device being used so frequently and for what are clearly not medical reasons. What do we truly know about ultrasound, its benefits and uses, as well as its safety for pregnancy?

Ultrasound in Pregnancy

A basic ultrasound can be used to confirm pregnancy as early as 5 ½ weeks, determining gestational age of the baby as well as to check for location of the placenta. A woman might need a comprehensive ultrasound to checking for the baby’s health around 18-20 weeks or as a follow-up to any of the above tests.

Ultrasound is also used in conjunction with other prenatal tests such as amniocentesis and the nuchal fold translucency. Some providers may also recommend an ultrasound to check on the baby’s growth during pregnancy or to see of the baby’s lungs are mature for delivery near the end of pregnancy.

How Does Ultrasound Work?

A prenatal ultrasound uses high frequency sound waves which are transmitted through the mother’s abdomen and creates an “echo” where the sound waves bounce off the object, or in this case, the part of the baby they are examining.

Who Performs Pregnancy Ultrasound?

Either your obstetrician or a certified ultrasound technician can perform an ultrasound. If you are having a standard ultrasound, you will typically need a full bladder to help eliminate air pockets between your bladder and uterus. Typically a water-based gel is used with the ultrasound transducer since liquid is a good conductor of sound.

Ultrasound and Estimating Weight of Baby

A sonographer will take various measurements during an ultrasound including: Head circumference, measurement from one side of the head to the other (biparietal), Thigh bone (femur) length and abdominal circumference. A computer generates an estimate of the baby's weight based on those findings.

Bear in mind that these are indeed estimates. Ultrasounds used to predict weight of the baby can be inaccurate by 10% or more. Be very cautious to schedule an induction or cesarean based on the findings of a "large" baby made exclusively on ultrasound measurements.

Potential Risks to Pregnancy Ultrasound

In the last 30 years, no conclusive evidence has shown that the levels of ultrasound used on humans are harmful. However some animal studies with higher levels of ultrasound have indicated changes in cell structure or function and even cell death. These studies seem to indicate that the tissue or body part that was being examined under the high frequency waves was altered in some way.

As a result the NIH has released the following statement:

Ultrasound examination in pregnancy should be performed for a specific medical indication.”

Perhaps one of the biggest risks of ultrasound is the chance of identifying something “outside the normal range” with the baby and the inevitable invasive tests, such as amniocentesis that result. More often than not, these “unusual” findings either resolve on their own or turn out to be normal by the time the baby is born. As with any other prenatal test, be sure that you have a very good reason for getting an ultrasound.

Brenda Lane Feature Writer , Chris Lane

Brenda Lane - Brenda Lane is a published author, Lamaze certified childbirth educator, DONA certified birth doula and approved birth doula trainer.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 3+5?
18 Comments

Comments

Jan 15, 2009 9:24 AM
Guest :
I am concerned about ultrasound safety in early pregnancy. I have three healthy children and then lost three babies during the second trimester of separate pregnancies. I had early ultrasound scans (at 12 weeks) which all showed the babies were perfectly formed and had heartbeats etc., in each case the babies died inexplicably a few days after the scan ... Now with my first three babies (who are alive and well) I did not have an ultrasound until 16 to 20 weeks... After a 4 years planned wait (since my last loss), I am pregant again, about 5 or 6 weeks ... I am very concerned about having an early ultrasound scan again. Reading your article made me wonder if I have grounds to not agree to an ultrasound until 16 weeks or later in this pregnancy.
Feb 11, 2009 9:51 AM
Guest :
I had approximately 50 u/s (both vaginal and traditional) because of a high risk pregnancy and my twins are just fine. At least 3/4 of these were before 12 weeks.
Aug 10, 2009 9:44 AM
Guest :
I, too, lost a baby at 7w3d after a perfect u/s with a strong heartbeat at 7w1d. I believe, for some women, ultrasound can pose some risk if done too early in the pregnancy. In reviewing blogs & forums for miscarriage I found many, many women that had the same experience as I did as well as the guest that posted on 1/15/09...a perfect first ultrasound only to find weeks later the baby stop developing literally within days of the first ultrasound. After 4 losses, I am pregnant for a 5th time and I will not be allowing them to perform an ultrasound on me until after my first trimester is completed (and the embryonic stage of pregnancy is complete as well). My mother had 4 babies, no miscarriages and guess what...NO ultrasounds. There is no benefit to having one in the first trimester so even if the risk is nominal, why introduce it into pregnancy? If you search diligently online you will find many research studies and opinions AGAINST u/s in early pregnancy -- especially the use of Doppler to "hear" the heartbeat in a transvaginal u/s. Unfortunately, u/s is a big money maker and has become part of mainstream obstetrics but all recommendations from the NIH, WHO, and OB associations state an u/s should NOT be a routine test and should ONLY be done when medically necessary.

You have the right to JUST SAY NO to u/s. Just remember -- they will use fear tactics to try and get you to take one...they will warn you about abnormalities, ectopic pregnancy, dating the pregnancy, etc. Go in ready to tell them you will have 1 between 16 and 20 weeks UNLESS there is a medical reason that necessitates the test. You have the right to refuse an ultrasound.
Aug 14, 2009 6:01 AM
Guest :
I had many ultrasounds due to a "high-risk" (I was 36) twin pregnancy, and thought my twin fraternal girls were fine until the age of 6. At that time one of my twins deveoloped OCD and anxiety disorder. At the age of 10 they have now both developed it. I know of 2 other twin families with similar issues and of course am also concerned about the explosion of autism in this country. Had I had any doubts about safety at the time, I would have been more judicious about the frequency of my ultrasounds.
Nov 27, 2010 3:08 AM
Guest :
I am a sonographer with 30 years experience in Obstetrics. The patients I see are of course the ones having ultrasounds. In my experience there is no increased loss frequency in the patients having ultrasounds. Almost all of the patients I see have a brief (less that ten minutes) dating ultrasound to confirm life and age. Fetal anatomic survey is done at about 20 weeks. The exposure time is usually less than 20 minutes. I do not, nor is it recommended to use doppler ultrasound in the 1st trimester do to the higher energy applied (although significant damage is on confirmed at these levels either). I am convinced that diagnostic levels of ultrasound dose NOT cause embreonic or fetal death.
Nov 27, 2010 3:31 AM
Guest :
Any medical procedure, treatment or patient care is with only done with the patient's approval.
If you have concern about ultrasound safety, have your provider explain and resolve the issue or decline whatever is offered. That is certainly your choice.
A parameter I like to point out with modern ultrasound equipment is the duty factor. This is the time duration the equipment emits sound. My 3D equipment's duty factor is 1/1000. This means the sound is only emitted 1/10 of 1% of the time the machine is on. This also means a pulse length of 5 to 8 cycles (doptone doppler is continuous). Ultrasound data has saved many pregnancies by showing fetal compromise and bringing intervention. Be prudent in your exposure ( to sound, isotopes or X-ray) but don't compromise your care.
Nov 27, 2010 3:31 AM
Guest :
Any medical procedure, treatment or patient care is with only done with the patient's approval.
If you have concern about ultrasound safety, have your provider explain and resolve the issue or decline whatever is offered. That is certainly your choice.
A parameter I like to point out with modern ultrasound equipment is the duty factor. This is the time duration the equipment emits sound. My 3D equipment's duty factor is 1/1000. This means the sound is only emitted 1/10 of 1% of the time the machine is on. This also means a pulse length of 5 to 8 cycles (doptone doppler is continuous). Ultrasound data has saved many pregnancies by showing fetal compromise and bringing intervention. Be prudent in your exposure ( to sound, isotopes or X-ray) but don't compromise your care.
Nov 27, 2010 3:32 AM
Guest :
I am a sonographer with 30 years experience in Obstetrics. The patients I see are of course the ones having ultrasounds. In my experience there is no increased loss frequency in the patients having ultrasounds. Almost all of the patients I see have a brief (less that ten minutes) dating ultrasound to confirm life and age. Fetal anatomic survey is done at about 20 weeks. The exposure time is usually less than 20 minutes. I do not, nor is it recommended to use doppler ultrasound in the 1st trimester do to the higher emery applied (although significant damage is on confirmed at these levels either). I am convinced that diagnostic levels of ultrasound dose NOT cause embreonic or fetal death.
Apr 20, 2011 12:06 PM
Guest :
Is there any danger for the fetus of a Pregnant Sonographer thats fetus is exposed to these high frequencies multiple times a day? Has there ever been studies done on this. Does a Sonographer need to quit her job during her pregnancy? If anyone has data on this please let me know. Thank You!
Apr 20, 2011 1:05 PM
Brenda Lane :
I am not aware of any research on sonographers and their own risk during pregnancy. It makes sense that your levels of exposure would be fairly small unless you were using the dopplar on yourself. Even in the animal studies that showed altered cell tissues was at levels that were higher than what humans are exposed to. Have you discussed this issue with your care provider?
May 8, 2011 4:06 PM
Guest :
Hi
I have lost 3 babys and I am preganat again and i have been reading and now am wondering if i lost my babys because of the ultrasound. i am 7 wks now i went in at 6 wks because i was bleeding and i got scared and ran to the hospital they did a ultrasound and told me i had to come back in 7 days for another one because they thought it could be the baby eas in the tube or something like that. I went in they told me i was 6 wks and 3 days and heart beat i seen it was 128. I wanted to take a pic so i can send it to my mom n the girl didnt let me. Now am scred what if i lose my baby now cause of theses 3 ultrasound.......
Jun 17, 2011 7:29 AM
Guest :
1. Pregnant mice that have received ultrasound had autistic babies. "The brains of the offspring showed damage consistent with that found in the brains of people with autism. " (Rakic, Yale 2006). It was observed that "a [...] statistically significant number of neurons fail to acquire their proper position and remain scattered within inappropriate cortical layers and/or in the subjacent white matter. The magnitude [...] systematically increased with duration of exposure to USW" (Rakic, Yale 2006).

2. There is a correlation (at least double the normal rate) between non-genetically determined left-handedness and amount of ultrasound received (Department of Medical Epidemiology,Karolinska Institutet).

3. Medicaid reduction between 1993 and 2002 is correlated with a 68% decrease in the incidence of autism for babies born to Hispanic mothers. Hispanic and Black mothers receive less pre-natal "care" than Whites. During this same period, the nationwide incidence of autism increased 57%.
Aug 27, 2011 4:27 PM
Guest :
If there is research showing an effect as small as an increase in left-handedness, that is enough to show that ultrasound affects the neurological development of babies. There is a long-term, massive study of autism taking place at several sites in the United States, called "SEED," done through the Center for Disease Control. My profound hope is that the information that they are getting from thousands of parents of young children with autism includes information on prenatal ultrasound, how often, what type was experienced. I have emailed a couple of the research sites to ask if this line of questioning is included in the prenatal information that are collecting, but they have not responded to my question. As the rate of autism goes up and up and up, one can't help but wonder if the dramatic increase in the amount of ultrasound that is used during pregnancy might point to a link between these two increases. When the immunization-autism scare became prevalent (which has been debunked statistically), many people began to choose to not have their children immunized. Choosing to not immunize puts not only their own children at risk, but puts other children at risk as well. Opting to not have routine ultrasounds would cause no damage to the pregnancy. Most pregnancy are not high risk so most pregnancies shouldn't need a great deal of ultrasound exposure. Someone needs to look at the autism rate among women who have had no exposure to ultrasound. If it's very low, that might say something.
Aug 30, 2011 12:21 PM
Guest :
It seems to me some people are correlating miscarriages with their ultrasound without any true link. It is more likely you miscarried and it happened to correlate with the time you got your ultrasound. Ultrasounds have been used for many years, yet only 10-15 people will miscarry. That number doesn't seem to have changed or increased over the years. Of course many ultrasounds are unnecessary on the whole most people are fine with 2-3 throughout the entirety of their pregnancy. I just think it's naive to say they caused all these miscarriages.
Dec 9, 2011 1:21 PM
Guest :
Where is the proof? Has anyone read what the FDA has to say about ultrasounds? They say there are “no known biological effects on humans”. Apparently it’s more dangerous to drink a can of Coke then it is to go get a Sonogram/Ultrasound. I don’t know about you but that’s a little fishy, and to just lay there and agree to an ultrasound is ignorant. Did you know, legally you are required to have a prescription for an ultrasound? More than likely this is because there are “un-known” factors with Sonograms / Ultrasounds. I am sorry but even if there is a little chance that an ultrasound can cause complications during pregnancy then I don’t see the reason in getting one, unless it is medically a good idea because potential problems are evident. Until I see unbiased research documenting NO risks will I agree to an ultrasound other than the time when there is a potential risk to the fetus.
Dec 10, 2011 7:37 AM
Brenda Lane :
One thing to bear in mind is that the research required to identify risks of ultrasound on the unborn baby would be difficult to conduct in an ethical way. They would have to use high levels of ultrasound and have pregnant women agree to be tested in this way so you can see how unethical that would be. Most of the research that has shown harmful effects have been on animals for that reason.

A good rule of thumb - as with any medical intervention, medication, procedure, etc... - is that the least amount of exposure you and your baby have to these things the better.
Feb 2, 2012 5:48 PM
Guest :
I used a heart ultrasound machine at work for less than five minutes. I used pulsed wave a couple of times to try and see the heartbeat. I didn't realized pulsed ultrasound could be dangerous and I am now very concerned. I was 5 weeks and 5 days at the time. I am so scared and upset, should I tell my doctor? Or because I didn't see anything on pulsed wave should I not be too concerned? Please help.
Apr 3, 2012 5:06 AM
Guest :
Dear mamma's,

I read all the comments and am thankful for all this first hand information. I had no idea about those ultrasounds..brr.. But I too have some information which might be helpfull, and it has nothing to do with ultrasounds.

Because there is an advice in our modern times, coming from all sides, to take folic acid I did some research on medical articles on the subject.

Yes it can be helpful in only one way, but taking large amounts of it (supplements) seem to, according to these articles, actually damage mother's liver and cause a higher rate of autism in children. Hm, now that is strange... Our mothers never took this stuff we are now all encouraged to take, and most of us turned out fine. There was much less autism in any case.

What I'm trying to say is that the companies who earn the most money in this world are farmaceutical ones and there is more benefit for them in us taking these supplements etc, more then there will ever be for the future health of the human race. Just be carefull with folic acid, all that we need is in food. PS my mom survived on dry bread first tremester because she couldn't stomach anything, she never took any supplements and if I may say so I grew up to be a relatively healthy individual with high I.Q and E.Q..

Bless all mothers and babies:)
18 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement